<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Delicate Dance between Ye and You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.trinityaustin.com/2010/01/11/the-delicate-dance-between-ye-and-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.trinityaustin.com/2010/01/11/the-delicate-dance-between-ye-and-you/</link>
	<description>Cenobitic Monasticism is Overrated</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:38:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bart Goddard</title>
		<link>http://blog.trinityaustin.com/2010/01/11/the-delicate-dance-between-ye-and-you/comment-page-1/#comment-10291</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart Goddard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.trinityaustin.com/?p=300#comment-10291</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m not following, but if I am, I have to disagree.  The distinction between ye and you is not plural/collective
vs. plural/group of individuals, but nominative vs.
accusative/dative.  If there&#039;s a dance going on it&#039;s seems
more likely that we see &quot;ye&quot; (nominative) in a command and
&quot;you&quot; (objective) when we&#039;re the receivers of a gift.  

I&#039;m for retaining the ye&#039;s, but dance I hear is you=Gospel,
ye=Law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m not following, but if I am, I have to disagree.  The distinction between ye and you is not plural/collective<br />
vs. plural/group of individuals, but nominative vs.<br />
accusative/dative.  If there&#8217;s a dance going on it&#8217;s seems<br />
more likely that we see &#8220;ye&#8221; (nominative) in a command and<br />
&#8220;you&#8221; (objective) when we&#8217;re the receivers of a gift.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m for retaining the ye&#8217;s, but dance I hear is you=Gospel,<br />
ye=Law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xan</title>
		<link>http://blog.trinityaustin.com/2010/01/11/the-delicate-dance-between-ye-and-you/comment-page-1/#comment-10283</link>
		<dc:creator>Xan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 03:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.trinityaustin.com/?p=300#comment-10283</guid>
		<description>Pastor,

It&#039;s a shame that &quot;you&quot;/&quot;your&quot; have swallowed up so many other pronouns that they comprise our entire second person vocabulary.  Compare Exodus 4:15 or Luke 22:31-32 between the KJV and the NIV for some examples of meaning being lost.

But I&#039;m not following what you&#039;re saying about &quot;ye&quot; and &quot;you&quot; here.  Isn&#039;t &quot;ye&quot; the nominative, and &quot;you&quot; the objective?  Like &quot;I&quot; and &quot;me&quot;, &quot;we&quot; and &quot;us&quot;, &quot;thou&quot; and &quot;thee&quot;, etc?

Nominative: &quot;Drink ye all of it&quot;, &quot;as oft as ye drink it&quot;

Objective: &quot;for you&quot;, &quot;with you&quot;

I have always been curious whether &quot;drink ye all of it&quot; means &quot;ye all drink of it&quot; or &quot;ye drink all of it&quot;.  I suppose it&#039;s the first one.  Or maybe both, since it&#039;s ambiguous, although I&#039;m not sure that it&#039;s ambiguous in the Greek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pastor,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame that &#8220;you&#8221;/&#8221;your&#8221; have swallowed up so many other pronouns that they comprise our entire second person vocabulary.  Compare Exodus 4:15 or Luke 22:31-32 between the KJV and the NIV for some examples of meaning being lost.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m not following what you&#8217;re saying about &#8220;ye&#8221; and &#8220;you&#8221; here.  Isn&#8217;t &#8220;ye&#8221; the nominative, and &#8220;you&#8221; the objective?  Like &#8220;I&#8221; and &#8220;me&#8221;, &#8220;we&#8221; and &#8220;us&#8221;, &#8220;thou&#8221; and &#8220;thee&#8221;, etc?</p>
<p>Nominative: &#8220;Drink ye all of it&#8221;, &#8220;as oft as ye drink it&#8221;</p>
<p>Objective: &#8220;for you&#8221;, &#8220;with you&#8221;</p>
<p>I have always been curious whether &#8220;drink ye all of it&#8221; means &#8220;ye all drink of it&#8221; or &#8220;ye drink all of it&#8221;.  I suppose it&#8217;s the first one.  Or maybe both, since it&#8217;s ambiguous, although I&#8217;m not sure that it&#8217;s ambiguous in the Greek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
